嘻哈四重奏 第二季

简介：　　故事聚焦住在英国伦敦考文特花园的一对老同志弗雷迪（伊安·麦克莱恩 Ian McKellen 饰）和斯图尔特（德里克·雅各比 Derek Jacobi 饰），两人同居48年后斯图尔特仍然跟母亲报备说是室友关系。他们相遇的时候弗雷迪是新晋演员，斯图尔特是酒吧男侍。如今两人都开始领退休金了，遛狗读报看帅哥、床头吵架床尾和的夕阳生活仍然异常精彩。
　　英国ITV台推出的最新同志情景喜剧《极品基老伴》由两位托尼奖得主主演，经典喜剧《威尔与格蕾丝》和著名动画《恶搞之家》的编剧和幕后执行制片人操刀，讲述一对同志老伴的毒舌人生，未播出即备受瞩目。两位主演作为已公开出柜的英国老戏骨，参演影视作品和舞台剧无数，他们的默契和互动构成本剧最大的看点。

简介：　　历史武侠剧《兵权》根据史实改编而成，刻划家国大事，儿女私情，场面壮观，武打激烈。
　　故事讲述赵匡胤（刘家辉）与结拜兄妹柴荣（惠天赐）、郑恩及贺彤（梁淑贞）共同扶助郭威（刘丹）建立后周，遭威之女婿张永德（黄允材）所不容，竟联合契丹耶律世藩（关礼杰）杀郭威，柴荣为夺帝位，故意不加援手，郭威重伤而死，传帝位予柴荣。另一方面，匡胤与好友秦傲（黎明）同时爱上耶律纳兰（邵美琪），纳兰与贺彤则争恋匡胤，匡胤与纳兰因处于敌对关系，未能结合，纳兰伤心返回契丹，匡胤终与贺丹成亲。
　　柴宽松在皇后戚戚（王绮琴）献计下，利用匡胤终与耶律安图（关海山）议和，暗里派兵打契丹，二人因此渐生嫌隙，及后匡胤与屡立大功，深受官民爱戴，柴荣恐他拥兵叛变，施计夺其兵权，柴荣，匡胤终正面冲突。
　　最后，匡胤败柴荣，被将领黄袍加身，拥立为帝，开国号宋，是为宋太祖。

简介：　　被过去困扰的年轻女子加入一位神秘教授和一群天赋异禀的学生，一起调查灵异现象，对抗恶魔

简介：　　除了生存以外没有梦想的车秀赫
　　与过去差点成为兄弟的李允大重逢
　　秀赫开始与无处可去的允大一起生活
　　这次同居会成为怎样的契机呢

简介：　　南宋初年，全真派大侠丘处机（周浩东 饰）结识两位忠良之后杨铁心（丁海峰 饰）与郭啸天，两位的内人都已怀孕，丘处机为尚未出生的孩子取名杨康与郭靖，借以纪念“靖康之变”。不料丘处机为两家人招来杀身之祸，郭啸天身亡，杨铁心重伤，妻子包惜弱（何晴 饰）被掳走。成年后的杨康（周杰 饰）在金王府长大，认了完颜洪烈（鲍大志 饰）做父亲，天资聪明。而郭靖（李亚鹏 饰）留在了大漠，被母亲李萍（吕丽萍 饰）抚养长大，虽然天资愚笨，但却有江南六怪的悉心教导，得到铁木真（巴森 饰）的赏识，并把女儿华筝（阿斯茹 饰）许配给他。可是造化弄人，在郭靖与师父前往江南寻找杨铁心一家下落时，他遇到东邪黄药师（曹培昌 饰）之女黄蓉（周迅 饰），两人日久生情，此时杨铁心带着义女穆念慈（蒋勤勤 饰）也出现在江湖中，穆念慈与杨康一见钟情，可杨康却逐渐走向邪道。郭靖与黄蓉闯荡江湖的途中见识了武林中的各种奇人义士，北丐洪七公（孙海英 饰）、西毒欧阳锋（尤勇 饰）、欧阳克（修庆 饰）、梅超风（杨丽萍 饰）等人纷纷登场。经历磨难，郭靖终于练成神功，成为一代大侠。

简介：　　林乐儿（宣萱 饰）自幼便失去了视力，终日生活在黑暗之中。然而，这不幸的命运却并没有让乐儿对上帝的不公有所抱怨，恰恰相反，个性开朗乐观的乐儿似乎比一般人更能感受到生活中的点点滴滴的快乐。一次偶然中，林乐儿邂逅了名为张家发（林保怡 饰）的男子，和乐儿的闲散不同，张家发时时刻刻都绷紧着大脑里的神经，只有胜利和成功对于他来说才会带来真正的意义。
　　乐儿的存在让张家发意识到，这个世界上还有另外一种完全不同的活法，而在张家发的身上，乐儿也渐渐找到了生活的意义。然而，张家发已经有了交往多年的女友，林乐儿只得将这份感情深深的埋藏在心底。

简介：　　冷幽默中逐步走向温情的舒适路线。一家子性格鲜明，奶奶爷爷都可爱的要飞上天。

简介：　　凯丽·拉塞尔与马修·瑞斯将带着《美国谍梦》第四季在3月16日回归，这一季的焦点落在生物武器的威胁与对钱宁夫妇秘密的挖掘之上。制作人乔尔·菲尔德表示，电视评论家建议他与制作人乔·韦斯伯格，就目前的剧情发展来说，是时候考虑结束了。
　　菲尔德还无法确定到底何时结束该剧，但他暗示本剧将在第五季或第六季结束，“如果你将它视为一部三幕式戏剧，那么我们现在已经接近第二幕的尾声了。但无论它在第五季还是第六季结束，我们都会认真挖掘它的新走向，尽力拍好下一部。我现在真的说不准它什么时候会完结，只会做一切对于这部剧是对的决定，并希望给观众不断带来惊喜。”

简介：　　受真实事件的启发，六集黑暗喜剧《Totally Completely Fine》由托马辛·麦肯齐主演，讲述一个有自杀倾向的女孩薇薇安在继承了爷爷的海滨别墅后，被迫帮忙那些离悬崖边缘太近的人。（@秃炮怪字幕组）

简介：　　Morse is taken seriously ill at a museum reception and is hospitalized. In the hospital, Supt. Strange, visits Morse to push him to take early retirement, while Dr. Millicent 'Millie' Van Buren gives him her book on a 140 year-old court case known as the Oxford Canal Murders. The case involved the murder and rape of a young woman, Mrs Joanna Franks, traveling by canal boat from Coventry to London. The case resulted in three boatmen being sentenced to death and two of them hanged. Morse starts to read Millie's book and dreams about it. He soon has a number of problems with the case.
　　Why weren't the three men also charged with theft? Why did Mrs Franks take a boat instead of a train that was much faster and comfortable and only slightly more expensive? Why didn't she abandon the boat after she complained about lewd behavior of the crew at the shipping office in Banbury? Why did she then drink and 'socialise' with the crew? What happened to her 'carpet bag' with which she arrived on the boat but which was not mentioned in the court case, nor was it stored in the archives with her, almost empty, trunk? The trunk was marked with initials of her first husband who had died. How did it happen that her shoes were found on the boat but nobody saw her return to the boat from the forest?
　　PC Adrian Kershaw does some brilliant leg work for Morse. He studied history and has invaluable background knowledge. For instance, he mentions that the boatmen had bad reputation because they worked on Sundays and did not attend church. Later a chapel was built for them in Oxford.
　　The dead woman's clothes and the shoes found on the boat are submitted to modern forensic investigation. The result is that the shoes did not belong to the dead woman found in the water because she was much taller.The shoes were never used in the forest.
　　Only Mrs Franks' husband, Charles Franks, was called to identify the body of the dead woman. He claimed that, while her face was darkened and disfigured, he found a birth mark behind her ear. The prosecutor welcomed that information "that only a husband or a lover would know". The accused were not shown the body. The defense attorney merely claimed that the guilt of the three men was not proved. All three accused claimed to the end that they were innocent. One of them was not executed because he embraced Christianity in prison.
　　Morse instructs Kershaw to investigate if Charles Franks benefited from his wife's death and, indeed, he pocketed 300 pounds insurance money. Case closed: Charles Franks murdered a tall women and dropped her in the canal after meeting Joanna in the forest. If Joanna Franks jumped off the boat at the same time as the dead body hit the water, she swam to the bank and joined her husband. The couple changed their names, in the case of 'Charles Franks' a second time after he 'died' as Joanna's first husband. The fourth boatman, a youngster who was not charged, was probably paid by Joanna to give false testimony.
　　Morse travels to Ireland and has a grave of Joanna's first husband exhumed. The coffin contains bags of sand and some stones.

简介：　　Three months after the Frobisher settlement, Patty is concentrating on establishing a charitable foundation when an old boyfriend, named Daniel Purcell, contacts her and entangles her in a new case involving corporate fraud and greed. Meanwhile, Ellen continues working with the FBI to destroy Patty, but she becomes more rash and impatient as she continues to set up her appearances to hide her rage behind fabricated grief in the wake of David's murder. Elsewhere, Arthur Frobisher is revealed to have survived the assassination attempt and is recovering in seclusion as he plots his next move against all the people whom he felt wronged him.

简介：　　《麦道夫：华尔街吸金恶霸》揭示了伯纳德·麦道夫臭名昭著的 640 亿美元全球庞氏骗局背后的真相，这是历史上最大的庞氏骗局，摧毁了无数个人投资者的生活，他们曾经无比信任这位受人尊敬的华尔街政治家。这部四集纪录片包含对举报人、雇员、调查人员和受害者的独家访问，并收录了麦道夫本人从未公之于众的视频证词，追溯了出身卑微的麦道夫如何成长为华尔街最有影响力的权力掮客之一。通过创新的视觉手法和令人兴奋的金融惊悚基调，高产电影制作人乔·伯灵格（《对话杀人魔》《犯罪现场》《兄弟的监护人》）揭示了麦道夫欺诈性投资咨询业务的起源，并首次揭示了其运作机制。许多人一开始并不相信这场欺诈仅仅只是一个邪恶天才的创意，这部影片也将对这一观点进行验证。《麦道夫：华尔街吸金恶霸》揭露了一群同谋者以及对麦道夫的可疑行为睁一只眼闭一只眼的金融体系，这无疑引发了一个令人困扰的问题：这样明目张胆、破坏性极强的欺诈行为会再次发生吗？